If I win Tatts Lotto, do I have to share the winnings with my ex spouse?
10 December 2014
This question sometimes arises in family law property settlement cases - and the answer will depend on the exact circumstances. As is usual in family law cases, there are many possible scenarios and many different possible results. Let’s consider a few examples.
If, during the course of a marriage, the Wife regularly buys lotto tickets (even if her Husband does not know about it or doesn’t approve) and she ends up winning five million dollars, then the winnings would certainly be included in the pool of assets to be divided between the husband and the wife on the usual family law principles. The win would be considered to be a windfall and the Wife could not claim that it should be all hers because she bought the ticket. Nor could she claim that she had the greater entitlement to it just because she bought the ticket.
Let’s change the above scenario a little bit and let’s say that the Wife bought the winning ticket after Husband and Wife had been separated for six months but before any property settlement was finalised between them. This actually happened in a case decided by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia on Appeal this year (the case of Eufrosin v Eufrosin). Let’s say it took another year for the case to get to the final hearing stage and by that time, the Wife had spent or given away one and a half million dollars of the winnings, leaving a balance of $3.4 million. In such a case, the court would have to consider the assets available for division at the time of hearing- that is the $3.4 million plus the other assets of the marriage which amounted to another $2.5 million. In this case, a very long marriage, with the parties approaching retirement age, the Court found that the contributions of the parties to the assets of the marriage (excluding the lottery winnings) were equal and divided those assets equally with each party being entitled to $2.5 million. It then separately considered the $3.4 million in lottery winnings. The Wife’s lawyer argued that the winnings should be all hers as the Husband made no contribution to the winning ticket. The Husband’s lawyer argued that the winning ticket had been purchased using “joint funds” and, thus, he had contributed to the winnings which should be divided equally. The Court did not accept either of these extremes, finding that the parties had put in place a system where each made regular withdrawals from the former joint asset, and he/she each used such withdrawals individually- the winnings were not as a result of a “joint enterprise”. However, the Court found that it was not just and equitable for the Wife to keep the entire lotto winnings as it needs to take into account the current financial circumstances and future needs of the parties. So, the Court ordered that the Husband should receive $500,000 from the lotto win and the wife keep the balance of $2,900,000 for herself- thus dividing the winnings in the proportions of 85% to the Wife and 15% to the Husband.
So as to reassure people who are divorced and already have a legally recognised property settlement in place by way of Final Court Orders or a Financial Agreement, your spouse would not be entitled to share in any of your subsequent winnings in those circumstances!
Should I change Family Lawyers in my Family Law Court Case?
18 January 2019 -
Are you having doubts about whether you are being well-represented in your Family Law dispute?
Is now a good time to finalise a Family Law Property settlement?
19 December 2018 -
It is December 2018. After many years of rising property prices in Melbourne and the rest of Australia, property values have fallen. The Australian and US share markets are also down. Separating couples now have assets (including Superannuation) which are valued at significantly less than the valuation a year ago. However, their debt level would often be at the same level. The net result of this is that there is significantly less to divide up.
Can we agree on a Family Law settlement without going to Court?
25 October 2018 -
Can we agree on a Family Law settlement without going to Court? This is a question asked by many clients at Melbourne Family Lawyers. The answer is both yes and no.
Should I Separate Before my Rich Parent Dies to Preserve my Inheritance?
12 April 2018 -
If your marriage or relationship is on the rocks and you are agonising as to whether to separate from your spouse or partner, then here is some advice which may spur you on to make a decision one way or the other.
When Can I make a Claim for Property Settlement as a De Facto Partner?
18 July 2017 -
In Australia, the Family Law relating to De Facto partners is substantially the same as the law relating to people who are legally married. The Family Law Act covers married people and de facto couples, including those in homosexual relationships.
When should I apply for a Family Law Property Settlement?
18 August 2016 -
The only legal rules about when you should apply for a Family Law property settlement are concerning how late you can apply. People in a De Facto relationship have up to two years after separation. Married people have up to one year following the Divorce. Contrary to a popular belief, you do not have to wait until you are divorced to have a property settlement.
When is Spousal Maintenance Payable?
31 August 2015 -
Spousal Maintenance (also called alimony in some countries) may be payable in Australia by one spouse (or de-facto partner) to the other under some circumstances pursuant to the provisions of the Family Law Act.
The Best Family Law Advice from Melbourne Family Lawyers
20 July 2015 -
At Melbourne Family Lawyers, we don’t offer a “free” first consultation and use it to market our services to you. The first meeting with one of our lawyers is scheduled for one hour because we know it will take a bit of time to listen to your story so that we can understand your situation and what is important to you and what you would like to achieve.
Is my Spouse entitled to a share of my Superannuation if I separate?
20 January 2015 -
In a Family Law Property Settlement, Superannuation is always taken into account when considering a division of property between spouses (including de facto or same-sex partners). These days, most people have Superannuation entitlements. Whilst those Superannuation entitlements may not be readily accessible now if you are below retirement age, they will make a difference to your financial situation when you do retire.
Beware of Family Lawyers offering Free Initial Consultations
26 November 2014 -
Have you come across the recent advertising from Family Lawyers offering “free initial consultations”? Have you stopped to think why those lawyers are doing that?
Do I get to keep my inheritance in a Family Law Property Settlement?
30 October 2014 -
It is important to remember that every Family Law Property Settlement case is different and will be decided in accordance with the guiding principles in the Family Law Act and the case law arising from past decisions of the Family Law Courts. This article summarises some of those guiding principles.
Achieving a Family Law Property Settlement with a “Bully” Spouse
27 February 2014 -
Bullying is characterized by an individual behaving in a certain way to gain power over another person- and this is often a problem in marriage or relationship breakdown situations.
How to Achieve a Fair Family Law Property Settlement?
6 January 2014 -
Achieving a fair Family Law Property Settlement is the aim of most people who end up separating, but what is fair? It is very difficult for a person to work out what is fair when going through the emotional turmoil of a separation. An experienced Family Lawyer can help you.
What to Expect from a Family Lawyer
8 November 2013 -
A Family Lawyer will advise you as to his or her opinion as to where you stand when applying the applicable Family Law to your particular situation. However, a Family Lawyer will never be able to provide you with a definitive outcome in your case as the outcome of your case will depend on the following.
Which Family Law Court in Melbourne?
8 April 2013 -
Clients are sometimes confused about which Family Law Court is appropriate to hear their case in Melbourne. This is understandable as there are three separate courts on the same street in Melbourne which have jurisdiction on Family Law related issues.
Achieving a Fair Family Law Settlement for De Facto and Same Sex Couples in Victoria
15 March 2013 -
The Family Law in Victoria is now almost exclusively governed by the Family Law Act (Commonwealth) whether you are married, or in a de facto or same sex relationship. The State of Victoria previously had the power to make laws concerning couples who were not married, but referred those powers to the Commonwealth Government in 2009.
Finding the Best Family Law Firm in Melbourne
15 January 2013 -
So your spouse has just announced, "It's over!" and you need to find a law firm to help guide you through one of the most stressful situations you are going to face. Where do you start? Do you go back to your local conveyancing law firm who looked after the purchase of your home?
Social Networks - a Divorce Lawyer’s Nightmare or Dream- depending whose side you are on!
11 April 2012 -
Watch Out- Social Networks- A Divorce Lawyers Nightmare (or Dream) What you say on FaceBook or Twitter may well end up as evidence in the Family Law Courts!
Collaborative Family Lawyers - What Women (and Men) Want!
10 August 2011 -
Marriage is a strange phenomenon that happens to human beings. And the best part is, both the unmarried and the married are unhappy, though for radically opposite reasons, one for not being married, and the other for being married.
It's Not Just a "New Mistress Law": Family Law Act Now Applies to De Facto Marriage and Same-Sex Relationships
15 April 2009 -
On 1 March 2009, new Commonwealth laws for spousal maintenance and the division of property for people in de facto relationships came into force. The Commonwealth Family Law Act 1975 now applies to both married and de facto couples as well as same-sex couples. Previously, de-facto relationships were covered by State Laws and disputes between de-facto couples were determined by State Courts such as the Supreme Court and County Court- Such disputes are now within the jurisdiction of the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court, as are disputes concerning children of all relationships.
Family Court Pre Action Procedures
9 March 2009 -
Family Law Disclosure Rules
22 January 2009 -
A direct extract from Family Law Rules- Parts 13.1 and 13.2
Talk to us now for advice about your situation by phoning (+61) 03 9670 9677